Thursday, April 18, 2013

Top 15 Reasons Why "Star Wars" is Better Than "Titanic"

Top 15 Reasons Why "Star Wars" is Better Than "Titanic"

Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 06:38:58 PDT



(15-A) Titanic morals:

a. gamble,

b. cheat on your fiance',

c. pose nude for pictures,

d. premarital sex is OK if you're infatuated.

(15-B) Star Wars morals:

a. fight evil,

b. do good,

c. respect all life even if it's ugly and slithers,

d. rescue princess,

e. save planet.

(14.) Leia is a princess, a senator, a freedom fighter, and Jedi material; Rose is just marriage bait.

(13.) Ewoks throw better parties than either first class or steerage.

(12.) Titanic is egalitarian by portraying poor people as sympathetic characters. Star Wars is egalitarian by promoting bug-eyed amphibians to Admiral.

(11.) We know Cal is the bad guy because he sneers at the poor and treats his fiancee like property. We know Darth Vader is the bad guy because he strangles people and blows up planets for fun.

(10.) Rose braves icy water to rescue her man. Leia braves Jabba the Hutt.

(9.) There are always enough escape pods in Star Wars.

(8.) Do you know what the Empire does to self-proclaimed "kings of the world"?

(7.) "I'd rather be his whore than your wife," just doesn't have the same sting as "I'd just as soon kiss a Wookie."

(6.) Han is frozen in carbonite and turned into a wall ornament. Leo simply freezes.

(5.) Han Solo would've steered clear of that stupid iceberg!

(4.) Yoda could use the Force to lift Titanic out of the water.

(3.) Stormtroopers blast big holes in stupid minor characters; everyone in Titanic was a stupid minor character.

(2.) When Star Wars was proclaimed coolest movie of all time by half of planet earth, George Lucas did not make a dork of himself at the Oscars.

And FINALLY... (Just in case there was EVER any doubt...)

(1.) We ALL knew that the damned boat was going to SINK!! But who could've POSSIBLY anticipated Darth Vader telling Luke Skywalker:

"No.... *I* am your father!"

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

My long overdue response to academic tyranny!!!

School admins/principals/teachers/and such others tend to have God Complex because they are in an environment where they are always right by default. Didn't some freaking 6 year old kid get suspended for shaping a pop-tart like a gun???? My LATEST outrage at this kind of crap is the story of Kyron Birdine (a current high school junior). Google his story along with Arlington Independent School District and WFAA News 8 and Texas Education Agency. I'm a 39 year old socially conservative bi-polar "2" male nerd in the nerd sub-culture, which as of now, is in a state of civil war! The nerds like myself are few in number and choose to fight pop-culture sexual immorality, that has us in a fix where RAPISTS and WIFE BEATERS get far more dates than we do, while we are told it is OUR FAULT! I guess the people who tell us that are suggesting that I move UP the food chain to BECOME a rapist or wife beater so I can get more dates! I'm on mental disability because I can't hold down a job worth a shit, and it's taken me 23 1/2 years (from the start of my 16th year until now) to FINALLY see suicide as something that no longer has an alluring quality and is any sort of answer to anything. The other faction has BEEN BROKEN and since they learn at a young age in life that they can't win in romance, they SOON imprint that mentality to ALL life issues (after having been so emasculated by seeing arrogant dumb jocks get girlfriends as easily as scratching their balls) and conclude to NEVER resist or go against the flow EVER again. Here is the letter that I forwarded to the Arlington ISD as well as the Catholic Diocese of Lafayette Louisiana: (I have not been Catholic since mid 2009) ***************************************************** Carbon Copy: Arlington TEXAS ISD AND Catholic Diocese of Lafayette Louisiana (LA) Concerning the four day suspension of Kyron Birdine in 2013 AND the 2001 banning from Sacred Heart High School graduation ceremony of Jonathan Castille AND the 1987 punishment of the ENTIRE FUCKING 7th and 8th grade class of Sacred Heart Elementary to march in a giant circle over the concrete back section, carrying all of our books, of the school for being too loud during the morning assembly to Homeroom class at the hands of (then principal) D.L. Vidrine... and HOW does this ALL relate to all of you, school admin idiot bully Nazis pussy imperialists sociopathic pieces of human shit??????? Before I start, I want to remind ALL of you cocksucking bureaucrats that I am 39 years old, and am therefore NOT some highschool teen kid that you can bully or silence with ANY show of force. If there is any doubt, re-read the first sentence! I'm actually hoping you little arrogant bully cum gulping self-righteous government prostitutes have the NERVE to accuse me of some bullshit that I DIDN'T do, DIDN'T say, DIDN'T imply, or DIDN'T even fucking remotely suggest in any way, shape, form or fashion! Teachers/principals/school admins are so stuck up their own ass, and have a God Complex because when they crack the whip to underaged minors, kids have no recourse, that they actually make up a rule in their head, that was NEVER told to the students, and when the student unknowingly breaks that rule, for having been NEVER in formed, the school Nazi admin officer, punishes the student! You can fucking RAPE a student on campus and since you are GOD as far as anyone is concerned, you get away with it! If you FUCKING give me any SHIT like a threat, a lawsuit, or accusation of me posing any danger to you, I am going to a FUCKING lawyer, the FUCKING media, and take your anal virginity from you so QUICKLY by drilling so far up your tight Nazi assholes that Vlad the Impaler will jump out of his grave, just so he can blush and BOW to me as a heartless and cruel son of a bitch, even by HIS standards! Now, if I've got your attention! We can get to business! In 1987, my Principal D.L. Vidrine had Miss Eva announce to ALL 7th and 8h graders, to go to the back of the school yard with all of their books. Okay, I thought we were having a fire drill! We get up there, and D.L. Vidrine is going off in a tirade about how loud we were in the morning BEFORE school started, in the halls as we walked to our homeroom class! He orders us to walk in a huge circle in this big path, so that the ENTIRE 7th and 8th grade student body did this until our arms felt like they were going to fall off, (one student Harry Gene Williams, dropped his books and D.L. Vidrine took off his belt and started whipping him like a mule or an S&M fantasy that I am now assuming D.L. Vidrine had) and when he finally finishes abusing us (guess he attained an erection from flexing his power over a bunch of 12 and 13 year olds, and was now biologically ready to go fuck Miss Eva in the ass in a few minutes), and dismissed us. We tried to write our drills in English, and we students complained that our hands were shaking when we tried to hold them still enough to write. Miss Tina just sighed (I don't know if she was disgusted by D.L. Vidrine, or not because she as well as ALL the other teachers didn't do JACK SHIT to intervene against D.L. Vidrine!), and told us to try to write as best we could. That was fucking amazing!! Then the next morning, Miss Eva announces that D.L. Vidrine wanted to thank us for being quite when we walked down the halls to our homeroom. This was a RULE that he made up IN HIS HEAD, and there wasn't JACK SHIT ever told to us about being "too noisy" in the morning, and MORE importantly, he FUCKING PUNISHES THE WHOLE 7TH AND 8TH GRADE, ignoring the ones that were NOT loud, from a RULE that he NEVER told us!!!!!! Okay, flash forward to 2001: I hear that Jonathan Castille got so pissed off at these two typical white rich stuck up ville platte bitches that had been repeatedly giving him shit, and even had been summoned to the high school principal's office before, that for the Senior Trip, he didn't care if their bus caught fire and went off a cliff. So, the bitches complain, like they DIDN'T provoke that out of him, and the school admin goes to the DIOCESE with this BULLSHIT, and the diocese labels this as a death threat!! Aw, fuck me! They even went to the Ville Platte Police, but the cops said the case was BULLSHIT! So they ban Jonathan from the graduation, and told ALL the students that if they uttered a word of this to the news, they TOO would be banned from graduation. I was so PISSED because this was the type of shit that I saw at that NAZI WHITE SUPREMACIST DEATH CAMP trying to pass itself off as a fucking school! I called the desk during my lunch and get forwarded to a Mr. Ducote, and his version was just that they didn't want students to repeat conjecture to the paper or TV or whoever the fuck. That calmed me down, so I was like, oh well, fuck it. Flash forward to Kyron Birdine that got NAZI BULLIED by the Arlington ISD this year in 2013: Who the FUCK do you NAZIS think you are???? He uses his twitter to post a picture of the phrase YOLO with a smiley face, and you cocksucking NAZI assholes crack your whip and give him four days suspension for apparently violating some technicality of "breach of security"???? Who the FUCK gave you the power to make up shit that doesn't violate JACK SHIT?????? How the FUCK was this kid supposed to know that you cocksuckers would extend the definition of this shit to include something that he did on his OWN PERSONAL TIME AND ACCOUNT???? FUCK YOU ASSHOLE NAZI CUM GUZZLING PIECES OF SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You remind me of that bullshit where the kid gets suspended for shaping a pop tart like a gun!!!!!!!!! I don't even know how to end this letter, but SOMEONE on this planet of 6 BILLION PLUS people needs to remind you that you are NOT GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I might have some legal obligation HIPPA shit or some bullshit bullfuck or some shit to say this,so here I go! I was suicidal in my junior year in high school, and on and off throughout college. I'd take math tests that I thought were a breeze and would get very low Fs. I went to counselors over and over and they couldn't come up with jack shit. I have boiling putrid rage at women in general because assholes get the dates today and guys like me rarely do. I was in this CLUSTERFUCK incident with a woman that was my PSYC 110 teacher in the Spring semester of 1993. I was trying to pay her a cloaked discrete compliment to but a bug in her ear that I may have an eye on her, then lay low until we were no longer teacher and student (she was a grad student) and ask her out, or more accurately ask her to see E.T. at my house on VCR, and THEN ask her out on a date. I had a very close female friend that semester and earlier that was repetitive and FIRM that she hates it when a guy meets her and takes 4 or 5 months to ask her out, because by then she sees them too much as a friend or brother. So, I thought that the woman teacher I had would tell me that (if I dropped no hints that semester) that she got to see me as a student only, and dating me would be weird. Also, I had the WHOLE FUCKING WORLD telling me that the reason why I barely got dates was because I wasn't aggressive or manly enough, so I was trying to be mildy flirty, but not pornographically provocative, and my compliment backfired and freaked her out SO BADLY that it snowballed and degenerated to her filing a formal police complaint against me with the St. Martinville police in Spring 1995, to tell me that they weren't going to take sides, BUT she wanted absolutely no interaction with me whatsoever in the future. So I said OK. I had NIGHTMARES about her for NINE YEARS that she was screaming at me and calling me a rapist and all kind of shit, and THEN I still have an occasional nightmare about her. From behavior that she exhibited from conversations I had with her in her office, and from a segment in class as my teacher, I concluded in retrospect that it was highly likely that she had been raped before we ever met, maybe molested as a young girl. I don't know. This pissed me off to no end, because the whole fucking world told me that if I didn't date in high school it was no big deal because college was going to be this magical land where all the formers nerds are going to come out of their cocoons and have a girlfriend and maybe even wind up married someday! Anything but! I watch rapists and wife beaters get more dates than I do, yet I am told I am sexually inferior to these pieces of human shit, and it is MY fault! In 2002, I got diagnosed with bipolar "2" disorder and have been taking medication for it ever since, and I have not advanced worth jack shit. I am on SSDI, and I am the worse off that I have ever been in my life because the ONLY things I want to do in life, which involve me building an activist political software company, seems impossible because of the MOUNTAIN or programming material that I've tried to study, but can not retain for the life of me, and there is no hope in site. Also I have religious problems with this because it seems that God put me on Earth to accomplish nothing at all. I left the Catholic church in mid 2009, and find ALL churches in contempt because Brittney Spears has more power in her right pinkie than all of the religions on Earth COMBINED, and THEN some! I hear fucking sluts and/or liberals bitch about their rights are violated and so-called "government in the bedroom" but THEY have not been dateless for SIX YEARS LIKE I have!!!!! And then we have Sandra fucking Fluke going to the PRESIDENT to pay for her birth control to have pre-marital sex; I can only imagine my Republican ass going to Obama and asking Congress to subsidize my monthly Vaseline expenditures so I can jack off without straining my SSDI check!!! Finally, I got to a point where suicide seems ridiculous and is no longer this appealing option that it has seemed as for so fucking long!!!! This has been a 26 1/2 year journey (ages 16-39), but FUCK IT; there's got to be more to life than blowing your fucking head off!!!!!!! My dear friend Christopher Morse Bullen killed himself in 1997. I would have taken a bullet and died a slow agonizing death, for that guy!! I'd give a limb to bring him back!!! So I got nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And to wrap up any loose ends to cover my ass: DISCLAIMER: None of said aforementioned text documentation of incidents and opinions is to be interpreted as any open-ended insinuations, suggested or however directly or indirectly implied course of any action or procedure, and is in no way to be construed or interpreted as any possible act with implied ulterior motives, OTHER THAN TO educate and inform members of aforementioned institutions and professions that THEY ARE ROYALLY FUCKING SHIT UP HARDCORE AND COULD NOT BE DOING A WORSE JOB IF THEY HAD BEEN PLANNING IT FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...and fuck you! Kirk James Fontenot http://www.ultrafaction.com theta_q@yahoo.com

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Legal same-sex marriage will snowball to more liberal indoctrination

http://news.yahoo.com/straight-people-paved-way-gay-marriage-132613801.html My response: My complaint is that government power to impose liberalism on citizens has been, and will SNOWBALL. Liberals have been SCREAMING at conservatives that NOTHING will change in their heterosexual lives and/or marriages if same-sex marriage is allowed. I recently debated with a few pro same-sex marriage users on Youtube, that when the brute, raw, sloppy and amoral FORCE of the Federal Government (aka Big Brother from the book "1984") orders Americans to have or not have certain morals, it allows liberals the POWER to define "freedom", & that it NEVER ends! When I cited that many pro so-called "LGBT" people have ALREADY stated that this is just the beginning and when I stated that this can and WILL snowball downward to have the GOVERNMENT redefine love, marriage, relationships, sexual morals, masculinity and femininity, THEY DIDN'T LIFT A FINGER TO DEFEND THEMSELVES OR CITE ME AS REMOTELY WRONG, but instead sarcastically asked why was I afraid of "CHANGE"! AND THAT IS THE TRAP! They SCREAM things won't change, then when called on that, they ADMIT it is a HUGE CHANGE, but they equate you to the EQUIVALENT of racist whites in times like 1940 that were against integration, and sexist males around the time of 1890 that didn't want women to vote! So, they ADMIT and EVEN ASSERT for it to be GOOD that the government (combined with pop-culture morality) is now a "God-State" that is ALL seeing and knowing, and INCAPABLE of making a mistake! Their rallying cry is "You can't legislate morality!", and FORGET that the definition of government *IS* the legislation of morality!!!!! As for the "Snowball effect"?? Birth certificates won't have "mother/father"; they'll now have "Parent A/Parent B". The boy/girl pairs in school dance classes are going to be blasted as a "hate crime", and I wouldn't put it past the more rabid liberals to FORCE hetero boys to dance with OTHER hetero boys, and destroy any an all pretense that any kind of couple must be defined as strictly boy/girl. Recently, a girl at a high school got ORDERED to change out her pro-abstinence T-shirt, because the school said it had sexual overtones! Never mind that high schools (thanks to pop-culture and a pile of other variables) are just indoctrination camps for sluthood, and some schools have the LEGAL FORCE to teach kids that pre-marital sex is OK, if you are "committed" to each other (translation: third date OR if you are drunk at a party). I got a BETTER one! If the "don't ask; don't tell" military policy gets tweaked and polished in the right way, it'll be impossible to ESCAPE the admission that with open showers that homosexual men are allowed to see the gender that they are ATTRACTED TO (being MALES, regardless if homo or hetero) bare butt naked, and can arguably be cited as a serious ethics issue! The ONLY way out of that will be for "LGBT" activists to STRONGLY ASSERT that it is a REAL issue of SELF-CONTROL, CIVILITY and RESPECT, so that as long as the homosexual soldiers have the utmost discipline and morality that is becoming of a SOLDIER, then there is NO problem WHATSOEVER! (And THEN comes the ethical SEQUEL of that previous event!) It can easily degenerate to a point where gender mixed military locations have CO-ED SHOWERS with male and female soldiers shower naked in plain site of each other, and that SHOULD BE NO ISSUE because there is this ESTABLISHED PRECEDENT that the REAL issue is for the soldier who is seeing the gender that they are ATTRACTED TO, NAKED, is one of SELF-CONTROL, CIVILITY and RESPECT! You see the problem of the LOOMING DISASTER???? FEMALE SOLDIERS will be ORDERED, REQUIRED and FORCED to shower with MALE SOLDIERS with no recourse in the SLIGHTEST because of the previous policy! Liberalism has a "crowbar" technique!!!! They inch along bit by bit and just get more aggressive with the more power they attain!!!

Friday, April 6, 2012

Rules for radicalism by Saul D Alinsky

The Students of Saul D. Alinsky
Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972) - the son of Russian Jewish immigrants was an old Jewish radical famous as a community organizer from Chicago’s Back of the Yards. From the late 1930s until his death in 1972, Alinsky crisscrossed the country, stirring the have-nots — poor whites and blacks — to demand power from the haves.

Many biographers have labeled Alinsky as a communist, but he always maintained that he never joined the Communist Party. In a Playboy Magazine interview in 1972 he said, “Anybody who tells you he was active in progressive causes in those days (1930s) and never worked with the Reds (Communists) is a goddamn liar. Their platform stood for all the right things, and unlike many liberals, they were willing to put their bodies on the line.”

From the book The Life of Alinsky….

“We’re talking about revolution, not revelation” - Saul Alinsky



Alinsky's Rules for Radicals
By Craig Miyamoto, APR, Fellow PRSA


(This is an expanded version of the 2000 Third Quarter issue of Public Relations Strategies, a quarterly publication of Miyamoto Strategic Counsel)

To paraphrase some sage advice, "keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer." If your business or organization ever becomes a target of radical activists, it will be extremely helpful to know what strategies of attack will used against you. Short of having spies infiltrate their organization - a practice that is sure to be found out and exposed to your discredit - it would help to study their methods.

Known as the "father of modern American radicalism," Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972) developed strategies and tactics that take the enormous, unfocused emotional energy of grassroots groups and transform it into effective anti-government and anti-corporate activism. Activist organizations teach his ideas widely taught today as a set of model behaviors, and they use these principles to create an emotional commitment to victory - no matter what.

Grassroots pressure on large organizations is reality, and there is every indication that it will grow. Because the conflicts manifest in high-profile public debate and often-panicked decision-making, studying Alinsky's rules will help organizations develop counteractive strategies that can level the playing field.

Governments and corporations have inherent weaknesses. And, time and again, they repeat mistakes that other large organizations have made, even repeating their OWN mistakes. Alinsky's out-of-print book - "Rules for Radicals" - illustrates why opposition groups take on large organizations with utter glee, and why these governments and corporations fail to win.

Large organizations have learned to stonewall and not empower activists. In other words, they try to ignore radical activists and are never as committed to victory as their opposition is committed to defeating them. Result? They are unprepared for the hailstorm of brutal tactics that severely damage their reputation and send them running with their tails between their legs.

Some of these rules are ruthless, but they work. Here are the rules to be aware of:

RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources - money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don't address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid "un-fun" activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists' minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

RULE 11: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Homosexuals are the new minority to pimp

Homosexuals are the new minority to pimp

White liberals have just about sucked all of the blood out of black Americans today. They need a new host off of which to feed. Alienation is a very powerful tool and liberals know how to use it. Alienation can get any sub-culture so angry as to not see straight and thus embracing liberalism. Liberalism is an ideology of emotionalism and raw dissension. All you have to do is come up with some vice of the past such as torture that was done in the name of God, or slavery, or rape being trivialized and then you have your first weapon. This first weapon is to accuse a conservative of wanting to go back to slavery, or wanting to repeal women's suffrage, whenever they make a simple point that at least one thing about the past was better than what we have today. Frank Herbert of the DUNE books said that a conservative will choose any past over any future. Also, Frank Herbert also said that a liberal is a closet bureaucrat. The second weapon of liberalism is to make the case that all old conventions such as organized religion and the two-parent heterosexual family unit, are pure evil and only through liberal dissension can one be free. The third weapon of liberalism is to polarize alienated sub-cultures through their alienation, instead of obvious institutions (church, family). The fourth weapon of liberalism is to allow leaders to rise (thus cloning conservative institutions), an obvious contradiction to the third weapon, which is to have no obvious leaders, but for the individual to be led from within. This liberal setup spews mishandled emotion and the leaders such as the sex educators, the Britney Spears, the pop culture sexual icons, the "sexperts", are to act as a conduit for this spilling over of emotion. This mechanism is a curious one: a car drives better the more that fuel is not wasted. The liberal mechanism drives better the MORE that emotion is wasted and mishandled. If homosexuals are going to be pimped as blacks have been for the latter half of the 20th century, then there are a few things to watch out for. First, as a homosexual, you have to kiss your individualism goodbye. If you are not in complete agreement with any prominent homosexual leader, on any issues, you are a sell out. Black liberals call black conservatives "uncle Toms" and "house n****s". Second, you have to hate anything about the past, since the past includes torture of homosexuals and "gay" marriage not being legal. Do not question this, or else! See rule number one. Third, you have to be politically correct, thus being hypersensitive in any issues that can be linked to homosexuality, which means ALL issues. Look at what happened to Trent Lott. He mentions at a party that certain problems wouldn't exist if Strom Thurmond had become President and was lambasted so severely that he stepped down from his House leader seat, and disappeared into nothingness. Remember that liberalism says that you have to be unified to win victories, so just like the Borg in Star Trek, you have to be part of a collective in order to function. Fourth, you are going to end up standing up for things that have nothing to do with your cause. This is the spilling over of mishandled emotion. There are probably tons more that I haven't thought of but there IS more. R. Emmett Tyrrell stated in his book "Boy Clinton" that in the 20th century that liberalism decayed to coalition activism, to special interest politics, to group therapy. My question to liberals is what group are they gonna come out with to exploit next?

Promiscuity Education

Promiscuity Education

(formally called Sexuality Education)

Specific Examples of Promiscuous Content

(A compilation by Lynn K. Murphy of Life Research Institute, (510)
676-2929. January, 1994 revision)


Introduction:

This compendium will show many, many examples of what Planned Parenthood, the Sex Education and
Information Council of the U.S. (SIECUS), and others call Sexuality Education but would be much more
accurately called Promiscuity Education. First, however, I must list some exceedingly important facts
about these programs. Then I will positively prove that these programs teach our children to be
promiscuous.

-- Promiscuity programs use peer pressure to encourage promiscuity. Currently, this statement and a few
others may seem outrageous. However, you will see that I easily prove what I say.

-- The sheer quantity of explicit material presented in mixed groups year after year removes inhibitions.

-- Promiscuity programs claim to be value neutral, but this is just a term which actually means "Don't pay
attention to parents or God, anything goes." That is not value neutral. It says, "Parents and God don't
count, but my values [the teacher's] do."

-- Planned Parenthood aggressively discourages parental involvement in teaching children about sex
notwithstanding that Planned Parenthood aggressively denies this.

-- Pro-abortion researcher Alfred Kinsey said, ". . . we have found the highest frequency of induced
[deliberate] abortion in the group which, in general, most frequently uses contraceptives."[1]

-- Pro-abortion former President of Planned Parenthood, Dr. Alan Guttmacher said, "We find that when
an abortion is easily obtainable, contraception is neither actively nor diligently used. . . there would be no
reward for the woman who practices effective contraception. . . . Abortion on demand relieves the husband
of all possible responsibility; he simply becomes a coital animal."[2]

-- Dr. Alan Guttmacher also said (immediately after the -Roe v. Wade Decision- that legalized abortion),
"Then how can the Supreme Court Decision be absolutely secured? The answer to winning the battle for
elective abortion once and for all is sex education."[3] Apparently, he knew what Planned Parenthood's
brand of "sex" education (promiscuity ed) would do to the pregnancy and abortion rates.

-- A current study[4] shows that for every 1,000 girls who take Planned Parenthood-type promiscuity
education, 113 get pregnant before marriage, but for every 1,000 girls getting abstinence sex education,
only 4 get pregnant before marriage.

I must request that, as you read this material, you consider the following questions, even though (or
especially because) these questions are unanswerable:

-- How does promiscuity education instead of abstinence education decrease the intercourse rate?

-- Since promiscuity education greatly increases the intercourse rate, and since birth control fails, and since
birth control isn't always used anyway, how does promiscuity education reduce the pregnancy and
abortion rate?

-- Since teens cannot be convinced to use condoms, how does promiscuity education reduce sexually
transmitted disease? (Only condoms and abstinence do this.)

-- Realistically, how many hours does it take to show biology? Perhaps four? So what is taught for the
*years* that children have promiscuity education?

-- Since promiscuity education takes money and classroom time, what subjects are cast aside to make room
for promiscuity education? Aren't these cast-aside subjects valuable in college or work? So how does
promiscuity education contribute to getting a college degree or being successful on the job? How does it
raise SAT scores? How does it make the United States competitive in the world economy?

In the following, in the TEXT I name the sources and page numbers of the sources I am DIRECTLY
quoting from. Then, where a source itself quotes material, I -footnote- this for the -Reference- section at end of
the document.

As I now proceed with explicit descriptions of promiscuity education, I will be asking you the above
questions and more. In order that you can be sure that you are reading my -questions -instead of the -quoted
material-, note that I will put my questions (and comments) in these type of brackets: { }




From George Grant, -Grand Illusions, The Legacy of Planned Parenthood- (Brentwood, TN: Woldgemuth &
Hyatt, 1988).

Pages 106 - 108:
"This week, a representative from Planned Parenthood had come to talk about sex, contraception,
pregnancy, and abortion.
'I was shocked,' Catherine told me later. 'Not by -the facts of life-, but by the way those facts were
presented. My parents had already had plenty of discussions with me about the -birds and bees- stuff. I
figured I knew just about all a fifteen-year-old should need to know.'
'I've never seen pornography before,' Catherine admitted. 'But this film was worse than what I
could have ever imagined hard-core pornography to be.'
The film was extremely explicit. An unashamedly brash couple fondled each other in preparation
for intercourse. At appropriate prurient moments of interest, the camera zoomed in for close-up
shots--sweaty body parts rubbing, caressing, kissing, stroking, clasping, petting, and embracing. At the
height of passion, the camera fixed on the woman's hands, trembling with ecstasy, as she tore open a
condom package and began to slowly unroll its contents onto her partner.
'I wanted to look away or cover my eyes, but I couldn't,' Catherine said. 'I just stared at the
screen--in horror.'
When the lights came back on, the entire class was visibly shaken. With eyes as wide as saucers, the
youngsters sat speechless and amazed.
*



"This film was worse than what I could have

ever imagined hard-core pornography to be."



*

But their guest was entirely unperturbed.
'She began to tell us that everything that we'd just seen was totally normal and -totally -good,'
Catherine remembered. 'She said that the couple obviously had a -caring, loving, -and -responsible
-relationship--because they took proper precautions against conception and disease.' {That's proof?}
At that, the speaker passed several packages of condoms around the room--one for each of the
Girls. She instructed the boys to hold up a finger so that the girls could practice contraceptive application.
Already shell-shocked, the students did as they were told.
Afterwards, several of the girls began quietly sobbing, another ran out of the room and threw up,
still another fainted. Mercifully, the class ended just a moment later.'" *




"I have never been more

humiliated in all my life . . .



*
"'I have never been more humiliated in all my life,' Catherine said. 'I felt dirty and defiled after
seeing the film. But then, when I had to put that thing on Billy's finger--well, that was just awful. It was
horrible. It was like I'd been -raped. -Raped in my mind. Raped by my school. Raped by Planned
Parenthood. I think I was--that we all have been--betrayed."[5]

Pages 108 - 109:

- The Shocking Betrayal -

"Planned Parenthood-style sex education is shocking. It seems to be designed to break down sexual
inhibitions, invalidate sexual taboos, and undermine sexual values. It is almost as if it purposefully betrays
parental and community trust, inciting youngsters to an emotional and sensual frenzy.[6]
*



"The idea, according to Values Clarification pioneer
Sidney Simon, is to stop parents and teachers from
defining for children 'their emotional and sexual
identities', and to keep them from 'fostering the
immorality of morality.'"[7]



*
Spawned out of the psycho-sexual morass, . . . Planned Parenthood's education programs and
materials are brazenly perverse. They are frequently accentuated with crudely obscene four-letter words[8]
and illustrated by explicitly ribald nudity.[9] They openly endorse aberrant behavior-- homosexuality,
masturbation, fornication, incest, and even bestiality--and then they describe that behavior in excruciating
detail.[10] {How does this curriculum encourage abstinence? How does this control AIDS?}
'Our goal,' one Planned Parenthood staffer wrote,'is to be ready as educators and parents to help
young people obtain sex satisfaction before marriage. By sanctioning sex before marriage, we will prevent
fear and guilt.'[11]


'The idea, according to Values Clarification pioneer Sidney Simon, is to -stop- parents and teachers
from defining for children 'their emotional and sexual identities', and to keep them from 'fostering the
immorality of morality.'"[7]
{Question: How does this reduce teen pregnancies?}

Page 111:
"Walt Maxwell was a teen trainee in a Peer Facilitator program sponsored by Planned Parenthood
in Northern Virginia. 'I only lasted a week in the program,' he told me 'I just couldn't handle it.
Watching porno films and talking dirty is not exactly my idea of a healthy extra-curricular activity.'
After he dropped out of the program, he was called in to talk to his school counselor and two
assistant principals. 'They wanted to know why I had such a bad attitude about the class, and why I was
being so uncooperative. I told them that I thought the whole program was disgusting. They just looked at
me like I was from another planet or something.'
In one Sensitivity Training program, the 'teacher-change agent' is instructed to divide students
into small groups, giving each an envelope containing cards with topics to be discussed: 'Virginity,
Oral-Genital Sex, Intercourse, Masturbation, Sterility, Group Sex, Homosexuality, Extra-Marital
Relations, Abortion, and Nudity--with acquaintances, with family, with the opposite sex, with the same sex,
and with close friends.'[12]
The students are 'to -identify -and -express -their present -attitudes -and -feelings -about these matters and
to practice -active listening -and -honest self-disclosure.-'[13] Once this 'self-disclosure' process is complete, the
group is to 'bring consensus by -winning -over other members.'[14] Those members of the group who refuse to
change 'are -considered -non-conformists or deviants.'"[15]
{This is a Planned Parenthood course. Planned Parenthood does more abortions than anyone. Does this
course provide clients to Planned Parenthood?}

Page 112: {This is Murphy condensing and paraphrasing Grant}: Planned Parenthood also has a "Role
Playing" program, a psycho-therapeutic technique used to change personalities. In one example of their
role-playing, students are asked to act-out having a discussion with a homosexual. At the conclusion they
are to come to a conclusion of what should be the most constructive result of the scene. {We have already
seen that to Planned Parenthood, to be constructive is not the same thing as to be moral.}

Page 114:
"And what Fantasies and decisions are the curriculums facilitating? One government-sponsored
program used widely by Planned Parenthood educators told teens that they could have fantasies which
involved "sexual feelings about people of the same or opposite sex, parents, brothers and sisters, old
people, animals, nature, inanimate objects, and almost anything you can imagine. It is -unusual -for a
person not to have some strange sexual fantasies."[16] {Question: How does this prepare children for the
Scholastic Aptitude Test so that they will be admitted into college? This material displaced traditional
education.}

*


". . . told teens that they could have
fantasies which involved 'sexual feelings
about people of the same or opposite sex,
parents, brothers and sisters, old people,
animals, nature, inanimate objects, and
almost anything you can imagine. . . ."


*
"Carrie Lipscombe and Laura Gibbs participated in a Positive Imaging exercise in a Planned
Parenthood-sponsored class at their neighborhood YWCA. 'The teacher told us to close our eyes,' Carrie
remembered. 'We were to imagine ourselves standing on the end of a diving board.'
'She went into a lot of detail, helping us to imagine the crystal-clear water, the bright blue sky, and
the warm, dry sunshine on our skin,' Laura said. 'She asked us to -feel- ourselves bouncing off the board
and splashing into the cool, refreshing pool.'
'Then she told us that that feeling was very much like an orgasm,' Carrie said. 'After that, we were
supposed to imagine all kinds of situations where we could -relive- that feeling of going off the diving board
-sexually-.'
'I was pretty shook up by that,' admitted Laura.
'Me, too:' Carrie said. 'The whole deal was pretty manipulative. I didn't like it. Not a bit.'
The objectionable feature of these programs now being promoted by Planned Parenthood,' says
economist and social analyst Jacqueline Kasun, 'is not that they teach sex, but that they do it so badly,
replacing good biological educating with ten to twelve years of compulsory -consciousness raising- and
-psycho-sexual therapy-, and using the public schools to advance their own -peculiar worldview-."[17] {Question:
How does being good in bed qualify a girl to get a high-paying job?}

Page 119: "'Now, though, according to Planned Parenthood's -Newspeak, morality - is an 'outdated' and
'judgmental' value system rooted in 'fear,' 'prejudice,' and 'ignorance.'"[18]

Pages 120 - 123:
"Lucy Lommers, Deborah Sullivan, Sarah Bakker, and Jackie Landry were all chosen to
participate in a unique educational experiment at their school in the nation's capitol. Sponsored by
Planned Parenthood, the 'Peer Education in Humane Sexuality' program was designed to train teens to
become 'peer facilitators' and 'responsible information givers.'[19]
'The idea,' Lucy told me, 'was to take a few of us and -really- teach us everything that a sex
education teacher knows. All the techniques, all the methods, all the ideas, all the strategies: we got all of
it. And then we were supposed to lead group discussions with our friends so that we could -influence -
them.'" {Remember my claim that Planned Parenthood was heavily involved with peer pressure.
Questions: Why is it necessary to pressure children into having sex? Does this reduce teen pregnancies and
abortions? Why not leave them alone? Or why not teach abstinence? How many girls get pregnant from
abstaining?}
*



{How many girls get pregnant from abstaining?}



*
"'The training was mostly just discussion between ourselves,' Sarah said. 'And they were usually
pretty -wild- discussions.'
'Wild is right.' Jackie interjected.
'Yea, see, the Planned Parenthood counselors who worked with us would open up a topic and get us
to share our personal experiences and feelings about it,' Deborah explained. 'Sometimes we'd see a
film--man, were they ever explicit--and then we'd talk about our reactions.' 'I always felt a tremendous
*



"I always felt a tremendous amount of

pressure in those sessions . . . I

thought that maybe I was the only one

in the group that wasn't hopping into

into the sack with some guy every weekend."

*
amount of pressure in those sessions,' Jackie said. 'I thought that maybe I was the only one in the group
that wasn't hopping into the sack with some guy every weekend. Listening to the stories my friends started
telling made me wonder if I really them knew at all. And if I really fit in with them.'
'Course, what none of us realized at the time,' Lucy said, 'was that we were all feeling the same
things. We were just too scared to admit it. I mean, who wants to come right out and say that they're
really not all that keen on -sex-! That's just not -normal.- Nobody wants people to think that they've got some
sort of weird -hang-ups- or that they're some sorta -prude.-'
'So we all just lied,' Sarah said. 'We made up all these kinky stories about wild sex parties and
stuff.'
'Well,' admitted Lucy, 'we didn't just lie. We also started fooling around some. I got on birth
control. Most of us did. But we were doing it mostly to be -normal -and -accepted.-'
'And to live up to the reputations we were creating for ourselves in the training session,' added
Sarah.
'Yea, that, too,' Deborah piped in.
'The thing was, the -dirtier -our discussions got, the more -bizarre -our stories were, the -better -the
Planned Parenthood counselors seemed to like it,' Jackie said.
'I know! Isn't it weird?' Lucy said. 'They would say stuff like, 'Now we're really getting
somewhere,' or 'It's very important to be able to communicate like this.' I'd always think to myself, Yea.
Right. What a pile of crock. But then, of course, I wouldn't say anything.'
'The whole mess began to fall apart, though, when one of the other girls in our group got pregnant
and had to have an abortion,' Deborah said.
'She was probably the quietest person in the program,' Lucy explained. 'Real pretty. Got great
grades. But she kinda just kept to herself. Tina was her name. Anyway, she was on the Pill. She told me
that she was pretty freaked out that she could do something as -radical -as take birth control without her
parents -ever- finding out. I mean, we have to call home and get permission to get an -aspirin -from the school
nurse, but we can get an IUD, or birth control pills, or even an abortion, without -anybody -knowing about it.
The counselor then went into this -long- lecture about how important it is to get all your feelings out,
to communicate, to be honest--you know, all that -psycho-therapy- stuff. Well, before any of us knew what
was happening, Tina just went berserk.'
'Yea, she started screaming and crying and throwing stuff around,' Jackie said.
'She said that the 'peer' training project had pushed her into sex, filled her mind with all sorts of
obscene ideas, and then forced her into an abortion,' Deborah remembered, 'She said she'd learned
-everything -except the -right -things and that she -hated- what she'd become.'
'After a while, she was just sobbing uncontrollably,' Lucy said. 'And none of us knew what to do.'
'I think we were all pretty confused,' agreed Jackie.
'And, what was worse, for me anyway,' Sarah said, 'was that I -knew- she was right. We'd been sold
a bill of goods. None of us -wanted- to learn all that stuff about lesbianism and masturbation and orgies and
abortion and birth control and kinky fetishes and stuff. And the things we -did -need to know we never even
talked about--things like a baby's development, guilt, venereal diseases, the health hazards of birth control,
alternatives to abortion, PMS, and depression. None of that.'
'After a minute or two, Tina left,' Jackie continued with the story. 'We were pretty stunned. But
one of the Planned Parenthood counselors, well, she just started rattling on about how -good- it was that
Tina was 'able to -ventilate -her frustrations,' and how the group was 'obviously growing in honesty toward
one another,' and all that stuff.'
*



"That night, Tina committed suicide."



*

'That night, Tina committed suicide,' Lucy concluded.
The girls were all quiet now. Heads bowed in sadness and shame.
'When that happened, we all got together,' Deborah said finally, '-without -anybody from Planned
Parenthood to look over our shoulders. And we just talked.'
'And cried,' added Lucy.
'For all that hype about -honesty -Jackie admitted, 'that was the first time we actually -were -honest.'
After another long pause, Deborah noted, 'I think we learned a -lot -of lessons out of this, but two
really kinda stand out. First, Planned Parenthood was trying to -force -us to learn about--and think about,
talk about, and experiment about--things -none- of us -wanted -to. And, second, Planned Parenthood skipped
over the stuff that we did want--and -need - to know.'
'Yea, the whole deal was really backwards, wasn't it?' Lucy said.
'I'm just glad it's over, and I'm glad that I'm out of it--that we're all out of it,' Deborah sighed.
'Really!' the other girls nodded. 'Really!'
According to Planned Parenthood's own national survey, conducted by the Louis Harris pollsters,
most teens agree with Lucy, Deborah, Sarah, and Jackie.[20] More than eighty-seven percent said that they
did -not -want comprehensive sexuality services in their schools.[21] Sixty percent said they didn't even want
such services near their schools.[22] Only twenty-eight percent of the teens had actually become involved in
sexual activities,[23] but ninety percent of those admitted that they had become promiscuous simply because
of a -perceived -peer pressure.[24] Nearly eighty percent of them felt that they had been drawn into sexual
activity far too soon.[25]
The teens in the poll admitted that their comprehensive sex education courses had affected their
behavior. There was a fifty percent -higher -rate of sexual activity for them -after -the classes.[26] Sadly, their
understanding of the consequences of such activity was not correspondingly enhanced.
*





There was a fifty percent

higher rate of sexual activity

after the classes.



*
From Randy Engle, -Sex Education, The Final Plague- (Gaithersburg, MD: Human Life International,
1989).



Page 4: "Unfortunately, it doesn't occur to these . . . to ask themselves why it takes 13 years of classroom
instruction, 45 hours of additional teacher training, and thousands of dollars in selected text books and
visual aids to convey such uncomplicated and straightforward biological facts."



From Eugene F. Diamond, M.D., "Teaching Sex to Children," -Columbia,- June 1981, 35. (Dr. Diamond is a
Christian-type sex expert.)

"There is almost a total lack of scientific evidence or statistical data to justify the inclusion of sex education
in a school curriculum. Most children in the world will learn about sex from a peer group or a slightly
older child."


From Human Life Center, "Planned Parenthood Advocates Permissive Sex," -Human Life Issues,- April
1983

Page 1: A description/complaint of a Planned Parenthood endorsed promiscuity-education program:
". . .homosexuality was presented as an acceptable option, and having an abortion sounded like a positive
experience." {How does this decrease the pregnancy and abortion rates?}



From Christian Defense League "Sex Education: the Assault on Christian Morals," undated

Page 4: Mary Calderone, founder and executive director of SIECUS said to adolescent boys at Blair
Academy, "'What is sex for? It's for fun, that I know, for wonderful sensations . . . . Sex is not something
you turn off like a faucet. If you do, it's unhealthy . . .'

'We need new values to establish when and how we should have sexual experiences . . . You are moving
beyond your parents. But you can't just move economically or educationally. You must move sexually, as
well. You must learn how to use sex. This is it: first, *to_separate_yourselves_from_your_parents*
(emphasis by Murphy); second, to establish a male or female role; third, to determine value systems. . . .

Nobody from up on high determines this. You determine it.'"[27] {No God; no parents} {How does this
encourage children to respect their parents? How does it encourage them to obey them?}
"Thus, SIECUS teaches that there are no standards of right and wrong, and children must not let parents
teach them about sex.

Page 5: "In elementary grades, teachers have had children model male and female genitals in clay."[28]



From Douglas R. Scott, -Inside Planned Parenthood,- (Grand Rapid, MI: Frontlines Publishing, 1990):

Page 27: "-Sex facts-, a Planned Parenthood publication, says in part, 'The anus (the hole for making bowel
movements. . .) is one sensitive part of the body. Couples sometimes enjoy touching each other's anus.
Anal intercourse means that the penis is inserted into the anus. Sometimes this is pleasurable for the
partners. Sometimes the anus is uncomfortable and the partner's may choose not to include this activity in
their sex play. Since the anus may hurt during anal intercourse, the inserting partner must use care in
attempting this. As with all sex relations, the couples can discuss their likes and dislikes and make
choices.'"[29]

Page 29: {Similarly with -The New Our Bodies, Ourselves-, Scott says} "The book continues by saying that
prostitutes are 'sisters' and they need the 'alliance' of women." {How does this discourage promiscuity?}

Pages 35 - 37: {Though Planned Parenthood failed to get this -Safety Dance- program implemented in
schools, this description of this sexually deviate program serves to illustrate the extraordinary perversions
of Planned Parenthood promiscuity educators specifically, and of this nation's promiscuity educators in
general.}

"Planned Parenthood is the primary educator of those who teach children about sexual matters. Planned
Parenthood of Northern New England, in cooperation with the Vermont Department of Education,
scheduled, 'A Conference on Family Life Education: Are We Prepared?' The conference was designed to
educate 'school administrators and school board members; home economics, health, physical education
and science teachers; guidance counselors; mental health counselors; librarians and resource coordinators;
sexuality and family life educators; youth and recreational leaders; parent-child staff.'"[30]
"The 'Safety Dance: A Safer Sex Dance Party," has a target audience of 'high school, college and adult
audiences'. A description and outline of the dance is available. One part of the dance includes 'Puttin' on
the Condom.'"[31]

{Planned Parenthood, describing this part}: "During the course of the evening each person receives and
wears a nametag depicting a different step in condom use. During this activity, participants arrange
themselves in a line (or a circle) according to how they think a condom is used (if there are a large number
of participants, have several groups perform the activity at the same time and compare results!) After the
line is formed, have the participants read off their tags in order. Acting out the steps can increase the fun
of this activity. The nametags are labeled as follows: Physical attraction, think about having sex, talk
about having sex, decide to use a condom, pool money, go to a condom store, decide what kind to buy, take
box off rack, pay cashier, decide where to store them, meet your lover, decide to have sex {NOT
WHETHER TO!!!}, need to use a condom, open package, penis hard?, place condom on penis, fall in love,
leave space at tip, roll condom down penis, enough lubrication?, if no use KY jelly . . . or more foreplay,
intercourse, ejaculation, hold on the rim of the condom, withdraw penis, remove condom, loss of erection,
decide where to throw condom away, trash it, wash penis, relax, feel good?, partner have an orgasm?"

"Another suggestion for the 'Safety Dance' includes, 'Demonstrations of fun and unusual condoms [from
Amsterdam, etc.] and condom use by placing human-sized condom over a volunteer's body. One activity is
called the 'Safer Sex Continuum activity'. This activity involves taping placards to a wall listing different
forms of sexual activity. Sexual activity listed includes oral sex, anal intercourse, the use of sex toys,
rimming, phone sex, and looking at erotic films and magazines. About 30 other sexual activities are listed.
Participants are asked to rank the placards from least risky to most risky for becoming infected with the
AIDS virus. As noted previously, educators were urged to assign the dance to students as homework."[32]
{Statistics show that most teen pregnancies begin in the teens' own homes when the parents are gone. How
do these activities decrease teen pregnancies?}

"It is recommended that the 'Safety Dance' include a 'condom relay race'. This event is described as, 'A
fun, 'competitive' activity enabling participants to become comfortable handling condoms'. The relay
requires two props: one condom per participant and several firm (not ripe) bananas. The players are
expected to open the package and roll the condom onto the banana. Another player rolls the condom off.
This process is repeated until all players have participated. The 'Safety Dance' concluded following the
breaking of a 'condom pinada' at midnight."[33] {Then what? The kids rush home to abstain?}

Page 38: Writing of Jo Ann Gasper, former deputy assistant secretary for population affairs with the
Department of Health and Human Services, author Scott says "Gasper provides some examples of Planned
Parenthood's teaching methods. These include having young students handle 'life-size models of male and
female genitalia'. In another exercise, 'a girl fits a condom over two fingers of a boy.'[34] In addition to these
'exercises,' students are taken on field trips." {Scott says one field trip is to a drug store.}

{Which of the above activities promotes abstinence? Which of the above activities even hints that
abstinence is a way to prevent sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy? Which of the above doesn't
encourage sexual intercourse?}

*



{Planned Parenthood's alleged goals are to
reduce teen pregnancies and abortions.
Isn't the above explicitly and precisely
counterproductive to those goals?

Why trust the organization which is the
*cause* of the problem to be the *solution*?}


*
Page 44: {Regarding boys and girls having sex before marriage, Planned Parenthood's -Boys and Sex- says}
"it's like taking a car out on a test run before you buy it."[35]

Page 47: "Several students interviewed for the Focus on the Family report said that abstinence played little
or no part in the Planned Parenthood presentation. One female student said Planned Parenthood 'made
me feel like I was a nerd or I was not cool because I decided not to have sex. They made it sound like
everyone, everybody's doing it and you're going to do it soon enough.'[36]
A male student said that he had 'never heard them say anything about abstinence . . '. Another male

'You know, it did bother me when they said that, you know, your parents won't understand and stuff and
that you can come there and get an abortion and nobody will ever even know about it. They just kind of
made it, you know, like a statement like, like you can go get a wart removed or something.'[37]" {Planned
Parenthood is fond of saying that they encourage parental participation. It looks like they're lying.}



From Douglass R. Scott, -Bad Choices,- (Franklin, TN: Legacy Communications, 1992):

Page 55: Planned Parenthood recommends the book, -Our Bodies, Ourselves.- This book argues that sexual
fantasies are healthy, and gives the following example of a "healthy" fantasy of a girl: "I fantasize making
love with horses, because they are very sensuous animals, more so than cows or pigs. They are also very
male animals--horse society is very chauvinist."[38]

Page 55: Scott says of -Our Bodies, Ourselves,- "Much of the book is too crude to quote. Slang is used to
describe sexual acts and organs. There are illustrations, with descriptions, of a nude couple in various
sexual positions."[39]

Page 56: Scott, quoting -The New Our Bodies, Ourselves,- shows how this Planned Parenthood recommended
book suggests that heterosexuals consider lesbianism: "Compulsory heterosexuality may make us feel
desperate when we're not with a man, and cause {???????????} us to jump into the arms of men who are
available but not good for us. It means we never have a chance to make a real choice, to ask ourselves
whether we would be happier with a man, a woman or alone.[40]

Page 100: The following is quoted from a parent who attended a Planned Parenthood promiscuity class at
Big Sky High School in Missoula, Montana: "I thought the implication was, is that sex is nothing to be
taken real seriously. It's there because it's fun and everybody should take advantage of it and enjoy it and
even if you're just 14-years-old you have every right to be sexually active, regardless of what your parents
tell you, and Planned Parenthood is there to make sure that you have everything you need to be successful
at sex.[41]



From "Official Transcript of Proceedings before the U.S. Department of Education for The Hatch
Amendment", quoted in Phyliss Schlafly, ed., -Child Abuse in the Classroom,- (Westchester, IL: Crossway
Books, 1984).

Page 85: A minister testifies, "In my son's 5[th] grade Health class, all questions were answered without
regard to a moral right or wrong. Homosexuality was presented as an alternative lifestyle. Sexual activity
among 5[th] graders was not discouraged, since it was feared that the students might be embarrassed and not
ask additional questions.



*



[for 5[th] graders] "The morality that was

taught in the classroom that day was

complete promiscuity."



*

I was present when a plastic model of female genitalia with a tampon insert was passed around to the boys
so they might understand how tampons fit. Birth control pills were also passed around and explained.
Anal intercourse was described. At no time was there any mention of abstinence as a desirable alternative
for 5[th] graders. The morality that was taught in the classroom that day was complete promiscuity.

As a result of this kind of education without morality, we are experiencing pregnancy among 13-year-olds
with resulting abortions. Our district's answer to pregnancies among young people, too young to raise and
support their children, is to supply more information on birth control and abortions."

Page 86: "In Mental Health next year, he will be required to complete the sentence: 'In my value system
the ideal age to start having intercourse is _________.' Age is not the question in the traditional moral
Christian system--marriage is the criterion."

Page 119: Theresa Bak provides what she said "is a sample of the remarks which permeate the filmstrips
and films shown to our youth: 'Sex outside of marriage is now socially acceptable. {This endorses it.} No
longer a single moral code is acceptable. What is right for you is objective for you. You determine your
own value, what parents did may or may not work for you. Decisions are yours.'"

Pages 146 - 148: Barbara Powell said, "The following quotation is a suggested assignment for junior and
senior high students throughout the State of Michigan:

"First ask the students to relax, feel comfortable and close their eyes. Then ask them to fantasize and
design a form of birth control that they would enjoy using. {Since only abstinence is 100% effective in
controlling conception, how does this program reduce teen pregnancies?} If possible, they should include
in their design how the contraceptive would work to prevent pregnancy, but this is not necessary.

Next, ask students to share the designs out loud, noting differences and good ideas. The various designs
may elicit much laughter." {which will remove inhibitions}

She continues by quoting from a federally-funded sex manual: "'Vocabulary Brainstorming:

(a) Divide the class into groups of five or six. Select one word or phrase and then have each group list as
many synonyms as it can in three to five minutes. Use words such as penis, vagina, intercourse, breast.

(b) Now, rearrange the class in couples and ask that they engage in a conversation for three minutes, trying
to use as many of the words on the list as possible.' {Note: "in couples." Now what are the children going
to say? "Now that I'm turned on, let's *not* meet at your place after school? Statistics show that most teen
pregnancies begin in the teens' own homes when the parents are gone.}

We don't need federal funding to teach gutter-level language in the schools of Michigan."

Page 155: John Tomicki said, "One film was going to be used in the 7[th] grade in my local school district; it
was to study 'How Life Begins.' That was the name of the film. It was subtitled 'The Male Reproduction
System.' The first words were--we are going to study now how life begins. Guess what was on the picture?
Guess what is being displayed? It was a young boy and a young girl in the front seat of a convertible . . . in
an embrace. Now, that was the message sent to those children: This is how life begins, in a front seat of a
convertible."

Page 156 - 157: Bryan Staff said, "I have in my written testimony 'Are You Ready For Sex?' taken from
the sex education curriculum at Manistee Junior High School in Manistee, Michigan. These questions are
asked to 8[th] graders:

'One: Do you know why your parents and/or religion have taught that intercourse should wait until
marriage? Do you accept these ideas? If so, then would you be creating a lot of inner turmoil to go against
your own beliefs? {I.e., throw God away. Go with your feelings." Now let's change the subject to murder.
"Throw God away. Go with your feelings. ???}

Two: If you do not accept the beliefs you are taught, is it only at the intellectual level; Do you feel really
comfortable and firm in your own beliefs? Try to imagine how you would feel about losing your virginity.
Would it make you feel less valuable, less lovable, less good? If so, it is a bad bargain. . . . {Why are you
worthless if you don't want sex, or if you don't want sex now?}

Ten: Do you have the opportunity for uninterrupted privacy, free from fear of being heard or intruded
upon?'" {to engage in sexual abstinence?}

Page 159 - 162: This is the testimony of Kay Fredeneck about East Detroit High's two courses: 7140 Health
and 1160 Composition, both for 10[th] grade.

"Another publication used in 7140 Health is entitled, -Sexual Intercourse-, author, Curriculum Innovations,
Inc. It is, in effect, a 'do it yourself' manual. The student is taken through foreplay, erections, when to
have intercourse, positions for intercourse, orgasm and how to act responsibly in regard to the needs and
feelings of the partner. . . . {responsible to needs of partner, not responsible for their own actions, for
morality, for the baby's life they begin, and for the baby's excruciatingly painful death by abortion.}

Based on the publication entitled, -A Glossary of Sexual Terms,- author Curriculum Innovations, Inc.
chastity is defined as: 'An old-fashioned word that means avoiding thoughts or acts resulting in
intercourse. . . . {Then God is an old-fashioned word.} {How does this reduce teen pregnancy?}

On page 77 of the text {this is the composition course, not the specifically sex ed course} is explained how to
organize a paragraph and specifically how to organize an argument. Here is the text example: '-Playboy-
should be sold on campus because -- '" {Three choices are given. None are "-Playboy- shouldn't be sold on
campus."}

Page 210: Robert Griggs testifies about a film shown to a mixed class of 6[th] graders: "The nurse asked to
show a 6[th] grade movie about vitamins. I consented, supposing it was a nine- or ten- minute movie. The
first three minutes of the footage was the actual birth of a baby. It started out with a lady [?] with her legs
up and apart, and her feet in stirrups or something like that, with a doctor. It was very graphic and very
detailed."

Page 215: "There were four very primitive films, and one was in such poor taste. Out of six minutes, there
were three minutes of a spread crotch shot of a man exposing his business--private business."

Page 258: Testimony of Jayne Schindler: "I don't know if you are familiar with the book, -Show Me-, which
is in many school libraries. This book cannot be sold in a porno shop in Colorado because it would violate
the child pornography laws, but it can be put in our public schools and libraries. . . . When I asked one
principal why he allowed books with such bad language, he replied, 'Some kids talk that way at home and
we need to make them feel accepted.'"
Page 409: Testimony of Phyliss Schlafly re New York City Board of Education's Sex Education Program
(SEP): "SEP forces explicit discussions of sexuality and genitalia on little children at the kindergarten and
primary grade levels." (p.30)

"A persistent undercurrent of SEP is its attempt to teach pupils to be tolerant of homosexuals.
'Experimental sex play' with persons of the same sex is described as 'not unusual' among 5[th] and 6[th] grade
children." (p. 63) "'Homosexual experimentation' is described as normal behavior of 14-16 -year olds." (p.
19) {Yet polls show only 1.4% of men are homos.} SEP states that 'most child molesters are heterosexual
males and not homosexuals.'" {So what! There aren't many homos!}

Page 110: "Incidentally, sex and nuclear war are the only two subjects which are taught K-12
{kindergarten through 12[th] grade inclusive}. No other subject is taught for the entire 13 years of
pre-college school-ing--not English, math, science, or history. {How does 13 years of promiscuity education
prepare children for college?}

Page 430: Testimony of Jacqueline Lawrence: "A drama group, specifically trained with federal funds, was
invited to the schools to perform a social-drama for grades 2 through 6. The group put on a skit during
which a stranger came to town to announce that God is dead. Immediately all the actors on the stage
began using obscene gestures, doing obscene things, and saying obscene words. When the play was over
the students went to recess and mimicked the actors' actions and words." {How does this reduce
sexually-transmitted diseases?}



From Robert G. Marshall and Charles A. Donovan, -Blessed are the Barren,- (San Francisco: Ignatius Press,
1991)

{To condense printout, I've combined some short paragraphs into one paragraph}: {p. 81. 1977 or 1978
Planned Parenthood (of Alameda) model school guide for leaders}: "The rubber usually attracts a lot of
giggles and the teens like to experiment with the {contraceptive} foam. . . . " {p. 99. Sol Gordon's Institute
for Family Research and Education's -Ten Heavy Facts about Sex-}: "there is nothing wrong with any kind
of sex . . . " {p. 99. Ten Heavy again}: "pornography is harmless. . . . " {p. 103. Institute for Family
Research and Education}: "there are various open marriages, swinging--from recreational to
utopian--group marriage . . . . " {p. 108. Elizabeth Canfield, author for Sol Gordon and birth-control
counselor, at work-shop at Syracuse University}: "There are as many ways of being normal as there are of
being abnormal; all these labels--who's to say? . . . " {From page 112. Sol Gordon, 6/20/77, speaking to
American Library Association}: "If I walk down the street and I see a pretty girl that captures my fancy, I
have sex with her. Now, the girl doesn't know about it {?}, my wife doesn't know about it, and it enhances
my walk. I don't want you to think that's my total repertoire, because it isn't. I have all kinds of thoughts
about men and women--and animals." {I'm sure you do!}

Page 106: "Describing one of their earlier volumes, -Honest Sex-, the Roys claim that emerging ethical
patterns 'will have to be found consistent with the highest Christian values, which lead to 'the expansion of
the erotic community' beyond the married pair.'" {The Roys are either mocking God or have never read
the Bible!}[42]

Page 311: "I want to say carefully and without elaboration, sex is morally acceptable in any form; hetero,
homo, auto, bi or poly . . . . that what makes any sexual act right or wrong is its consequences, because in
and of itself sex is neither good nor bad, neither praiseworthy nor blameworthy, and its ethical significance
depends upon the values it serves and seeks to realize."[43]



From Melvin Anchell, M.D., A.S.P.P., -Killers of Children, a Psychoanalytic Look at Sex Education,-
American Life League:

Page 92 about Planned Parenthood's "Guide and Resource Manual" used in Santa Cruz, CA and
obtainable from them at 212 Laurel Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 for $20: "The final topic in the
'Sexuality and Values' section---a section that is supposed to somehow give young people better values than
established ones---is Homosexuality. Homosexuality is taught as a normal variation, i.e., a normal lifestyle.
The manuals advise sex teachers to bring homosexuals directly into the classroom to give students first
hand information about how homosexuals conduct themselves sexually. Students are taught that the
homosexual's oral-genital sex acts, his oral-anal acts, his self and mutual masturbation, etc., are normal
and benefi-cial. The only prerequisite for engaging in homosexual-lesbian sex acts---students are taught---is
that one enjoy them." {This program, apparently, is supposed to teach them to enjoy them.}

Page 95: "There is one main overriding theme in today's school sex programs---and that theme is -carnality-.
School sex teachings are essentially 'how to' courses that condone and teach fornication along with all
forms of perverted sex acts."

Pages 153 - 163: {This is a glimpse of Planned Parenthood's "Family Life Education Curriculum K-12" of
Northern New England (created by Sal Wiggin). The page numbers I use are page numbers from the
Planned Parenthood document.}

"Grade 8 . . . . P. 20-21: Student is to identify: when in one's life contraception may be appropriate for him
or her; discuss and clarify myths about contraception, and list five methods of contraception and how to
obtain each one."

"Interpersonal relationships--Grades 9-12, P. 15 & 19: Shown Filmstrip 'Four Sequences' Same Sex
Relationship Sequence: Some of the frames of the film are. . . Close up of adult males with arms around
each other. Close up of young adult girls kissing. Girls nude bathing together. Girls comparing
breast size. Nude boys relaxing on patio. teenage boys reading Playboy. Adult males in shower.
Close ups of Adult Males kissing."

*


"[the film shows] Close ups of Adult Males Kissing."






{How does this prevent AIDS?}



*
P. 15: "The purpose of this exercise is to illustrate that touch, affection and intimacy between members of
the same sex are natural aspects of important learning experiences for those involved." "Student is to
think of one's best friend of the same sex and to imagine that on the given sheet that the printed drawings
are of their best friend. They are then to "shade in the parts of the friend's body they would feel
comfortable touching, depending whether they were in a public or private setting."

P. 17: "It is important for adults to be aware that the normal pattern of psychosexual development for
children and young people moves from solitary masturbatory behavior to masturbation with one or two
friends of the same sex to exploratory sexual behavior with them."
From Assembly, State of California, -Conference on the Preservation of the Family: Summary of the 1988
Public Hearings on the Family,-

Page 266: {This is a part of a tenth-grade sexuality education program. It was invented by Education
Training Research Associates, which is just as pornographic as Planned Parenthood and SIECUS.}

"Shopping Information Form (Optional Homework Assignment)

1. Name of Store_______________

2. What contraceptive products are sold here? (List 3 kinds of condoms, 1 kind of foam and 1 kind of
sponge, their prices for each product. {No mention that only abstinence is 100% effective against sexually
transmitted diseases and pregnancy. Per former U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, three million
teens get an STD yearly. Ref: Kim Painter of the liberal -USA Today-, April 13, 1992.}

3. How comfortable would you be buying contraception here? very comfortable? fairly comfortable?
somewhat comfortable? very uncomfortable?

4. Would you recommend that a friend buy contraception here? Yes or no. {No mention of marriage.}

5. What are the store hours of business?


Clinic Visit (Homework Assignment)

(In class 8, students locate birth control clinics in their area and make plans for visiting one to get
information about birth control.)" {Question: How does this help them to be able to go to a store and
properly fill out a job application?}



From "You've Changed the Combination," Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains:

Page 9: "Sex is best between friends." {No mention of marriage.}

Page 10: "There are only two basic kinds of sex: sex with victims and sex without. Sex with victims is
always wrong. Sex without is always right." {A half truth: They don't know if there will be a victim due to
disease; they don't know if there will be a victim due to pregnancy. They don't know if there will be a
victim due to adultery. They don't say that there will be at least one victim if there is an abortion.}

{Twenty-three major medical studies prove that abortion approximately doubles the breast cancer rate of
aborters and that the type of breast cancer contracted is deadlier. (The cancer is apparently caused by
unnatural interruption of hormonal changes.)
*




{SINCE BREAST CANCER IS A VERY LARGE KILLER

OF WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES, EVEN A VERY

SMALL PERCENT INCREASE IN BREAST CANCER DUE

TO ABORTION KILLS THOUSANDS OF WOMEN!}



*
Page 18: "Don't lie to yourself. Decide honestly what you want from your relationships with women. Do
you want a convenient warm body? buy one. That's right. There are women who have freely chosen that
business, buy one. . . Do you want a virgin to marry? Buy one. There are girls in that business, too.
Marriage is the price you'll pay, and you'll get the virgin. Very temporarily."



From Richard Glasow and Mrs. Glasow, "An Expose on PP's Three-lane Road to the Brave New World."
Richard Glasow works at National Right to Life Committee, Inc., 419 7[th] St., NW, Washington, DC 20004:
*



"One film . . . available at PP clinics
has been strongly criticized by the
Arizona House Interim Committee on Obscenity
as 'blatently offensive' and possibly in
violation of state laws . . ."



*
Page 3: "One film, 'About Sex,' produced by Sol Gordon and available at PP clinics, has been strongly
criticized by the Arizona House Interim Committee on Obscenity as 'blatantly offensive' and possibly in
violation of state laws about obscenity and contributing to the delinquency of minors. The committee
stated that the portions of the film depicting '. . . the nude couple engaged in the sex act, the nude woman in
a suggestive, reclining position, and the nude go-go dancer would appeal to the prurient interest of minors.'
The committee also denounced the 'use of gutter language throughout the film.' this film has been shown
in schools in PA and vividly illustrates PP's philosophy of sex education, which is 'if it feels good, do it.'
The narrator encourages masturbation, abortion, and contraception use by unmarried teens"[44]{How does
this promote adequate earning power for later life?}

Page 3: "[Sol Gordon] also wrote a pamphlet for teenagers entitled -TEN HEAVY FACTS ABOUT SEX- that
encourages acceptance of homosexuality and suggests that sodomy, bisexuality and masturbation are
natural and completely acceptable."[45]





From "What does PP say to Educators, Parents and Supporters?" American Life League:

"Sex is fun, and joyful, and courting is fun, and joyful, and it comes in all types and styles, all of which are
OK. Do what gives pleasure and enjoy what gives pleasure and ask for what gives pleasure. Don't rob
yourself of joy by focusing on old-fashioned ideas about what's 'normal' or 'nice'."[46]
*



{By teaching promiscuity, a very clear message

is being sent: Adult authorities don't want

abstinence for kids, they *want* them to screw.}



*
"Sex is too important to glop up with sentiment."[47]

"If you're not supposed to go after a girl for sex, what are you supposed to do?"[48] {Well now let me think.
Treat her like a human being? Treat her like a friend?}

"A lot of people wonder about oral and anal sex (mouth to penis, vagina or anus; or penis to anus). Some
say that such acts are perverse or degrading. Other people consider them to be a normal part of foreplay
or a substitute for intercourse. . . "We say, no one has the right to condemn a person on the basis of that
person's manner of sexual expression. . . "[49] {Condemning isn't the issue! Disease and perversion are!}



From a paraphrase of Sal Wiggin's "Family Life Education Curriculum K-12 of Northern New England,"
pages 282 & 283:

"KINDERGARTEN . . . . P. 5 - Children are asked to outline partner's bodies and verbally label all parts
including genitals and buttocks.

GRADE 3 . . . P.11 & 12 - Diagrams shown of Male/Female Reproductive Systems. Children are asked to
make models of reproductive organs using: Ping Pong Balls, straw, paper cup, yarn and cellophane bag.

GRADE 6 . . . P. 12 - 'Dear Diary' movie shown. Question: What was 'the gush feeling down there?'
What are some causes of the tingly feelings in the vulva region?' 'Do girls masturbate?'

P. 18 - Minimal outline of prenatal development. In third trimester they state 'body proportions are more
{more?} human.' 'Fetus can survive . . . if born prematurely.' {They do not state that babies born earlier
than third trimester have also survived.}

P. 94 - Abortion methods are listed.

P. 95 - 'Legal abortion is a relatively safe, uncomplicated procedure. Abortion in the first trimester is 10
times safer than childbirth' {This is NOT true!} . . . Results are quoted from a survey done by a national
abortion group indicating that 83% of American voters supported abortion in all or some circumstances."
{The voters didn't!}



From Jacqueline Kasun, "Slaughter on Main Street" (Clovis, CA: Valley Christian University Press, n.d.):

Page 3: "The sex-curriculum guide for elementary schools in my city specifies that children will 'develop
an understanding of homosexuality,' 'learn the vocabulary and social fads' relating to it, 'study the
theories concerning it,' view films and ENGAGE IN ROLE PLAYING ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY,
and take tests on it." (Emphasis by Murphy.)

Page 5: "The curriculum guide drawn up for school in Ferndale, California, suggests that high school
students work as boy-girl pairs on 'physiology definition sheets' in which they define 'foreplay,' 'erection,'
'ejaculation,' and similar terms. Whether or not students are satisfied with their 'size of sex organs' is
suggested as a topic of class discussion in this curriculum." {Grade not specified.}
"The teacher of a 'sexuality' class I attended distributed instructions for 'Group Drawing of Female
and Male Reproductive Anatomy,' in which high school students are to 'break up into groups of four to six
persons, with men and women in each group.' Each group then makes a drawing of the female and male
reproductive organs and genitals, including the penis, scrotum, testes, vagina, clitoris, cervix, labia, and
other parts. When the groups have finished, the teacher instructs them to check their drawings against
accurate ones which she projects on the wall to 'correct them' and to 'talk about inaccuracies.' The
instructions for this exercise state that its purpose is 'to provide a relaxed 'non-academic' means of
reviewing the basic sexual physiology,' to 'provide a setting in which ignorance about physiology may be
revealed without shame,{????????}' and to 'provide an opportunity to work as a group on a task.' . . . The
guide instructs the teacher to have students 'discuss how they felt about 'drawing sex organs.'" {How does
this promote abstinence? How does it reduce pregnancy and abortion?}



From a letter to Beverly LaHaye of Concerned Women for America, P. O. Box 67000, Washington, DC
20035. (A copy is available from Lynn Murphy.)

Page 2: "This plastic model was used to show the students SEVERAL TIMES how to insert contraceptive
sponges. A detailed, explicit discussion was also given concerning the vaginal mucus discharge that all
women have and how a woman can tell by her mucus discharge whether or not she is ovulating. The class
was told to 'take some of the discharge from the lining of your panties and try to see how sticky it is by
working it between your thumb and middle finger. See how far you can stretch it. If it can stretch about
an inch or more without breaking, it is called 'spin', and means that you are ovulating, and can get
pregnant. During that time, you will want to use a condom, contraceptive sponge, or other method of birth
control.'" {In other words, you *will* screw. This is a given. There is no "-if- you screw, then you should
use . . . .} {Who is going to do these tests in the urgency of the dark back seat of a car?}

Page 2: "Kids also told me about 'valentines' Planned Parenthood GIVES to kids. I could hardly believe
this, so obtained one myself to show what our tax dollars are paying for. The 'valentine' has a big red
heart on the front and says: 'love carefully'. On the inside is a [real] red condom." {The author of this
letter then called a Planned Parenthood person about this, and wrote that this person said they offer
several colors of condoms and that 'kids think it's just more erotic and fun to do it with colored condoms.'
She also said they would soon have some flavored condoms.}


From a letter to the editor of "The Valley Press," Felton, CA:

"I am a student at SLV [San Lorenzo Valley] High. I attended the sex education program put on
by Planned Parenthood for our required {note that it is required} health class.
In all the controversy that has gone on and all the second and third hand testimonies and opinions
that have been given, I would now like to, for everyone, give a first hand account of what went on, one day
in particular, in our unmonitored sex education class:
The class was begun by an instructor from Planned Parenthood. He first asked abruptly and
crudely, "How many of you are having sex right now?"
His first five minutes of lecturing dealt with nothing else but the fact that all of us were involved in
sex or would be soon!
This for me as well as for a lot of other kids in the class was shocking!
He then used 25 minutes to--in detail--describe all the contraceptive devices.
As for abstinence, it was not presented in the way that Sandy Orwitz, the director of Planned
Parenthood stated that it was. Abstinence was listed as ineffective and placed in the bad column on the
blackboard.
The lecturer never even acknowledged that a few might use abstinence till marriage or until we had
reached maturity.
The instructor in a big joke placed a diaphragm on his nose again and again.
He also blew up a rubber until it was about to pop and let it jet around the room.
The instructor described his sexual experience in previous weeks, which can in no way be justified
in a public school funded by our parents' taxes.
The whole class was presented unprofessionally, crudely, and just plain gross!
Through the whole period the grossest overtones were created by every move the unqualified
instructor made.
. . . We don't need anyone to come in and preach his distorted sexual attitudes at us under the
guidelines of public education.
I hope that the people of San Lorenzo Valley will not let this program be repeated."



From "Sex: A Topic for Conversation with Sol Gordon for Teenagers":

"Now listen, this is very important: all thoughts, wishes, sexual arousals are normal. There are no
abnormal dreams, wishes, fantasies or sexual arousals. You can have any kind of thought you like." {So I
guess it's okay to imagine you're raping the male principal of the school that allowed this into his school.}



From "AIDS: AM I AT RISK? A CHECKLIST FOR MODERN LOVERS," (Santa Cruz, CA: Network
Publications, 1988):

This was promiscuity-education material given to students via the Social Studies Department programs of
San Lorenzo High School in Felton, CA:

"DO'S & DON'TS FOR MODERN LOVERS: Lower your chances of getting AIDS by practicing safer
sex habits with the use of condoms {not abstinence}. The not only offer the best protection against AIDS
but they could prevent an unwanted pregnancy as well. You may have to changes some of your sexual
practices but it doesn't mean you're doomed to boredom.
Here's a chance to put your sexual imagination to work. You'll just have to think of some new and
exciting ways to enjoy sex -a la rubbers-.

DO!
Use a condom and a nonoxynol-9 spermicide for vaginal sex. {Among other things, this says to have sex.}

Use a condom and some kind of lubricant containing nonoxynol-9 for anal sex. {Have anal sex.}

Use a condom or latex barrier for oral sex. {Have oral sex}.



From "TALKING WITH YOUR PARTNER ABOUT USING CONDOMS," (Santa Cruz, CA: Network
Publications, 1989) {Partner, not wife}

This was promiscuity-education material given to students via the Social Studies Department programs of
San Lorenzo High School in Felton, CA. This shows how a student is supposed to respond when his or her
partner doesn't want to use a condom:

"She says: 'Condoms taste terrible.'
You say: 'Let's try some of those new flavored condoms.'

He says: 'It's embarrassing to buy them.'
You say: 'Let's buy a big box. That way we won't have to buy them again for a long time.' {Now that's
abstinence!!!!!!}

She says: 'They're too dry. They make sex uncomfortable.'
You say: ' Let's try lubricated condoms. If they still feel dry, we can use some K-Y Jelly or Astro Glide.'

He says: 'I'm allergic to them.'
She says: 'Let's try another brand or a different lubricant or spermicide.' or 'I'm allergic to sperm. It
could make me break out in STDs and sometimes even pregnancy.'

He says: 'They look ugly.'
You say: 'I think you look incredibly sexy. Seeing you in a condom really turns me on.'

She says: 'I'm a virgin.'
You say: 'I'm not. This way we'll both be protected.'

He says: 'Condoms are too expensive.'
You say: 'Let's stop by the family planning clinic. Condoms are free there.'"


From an AIDS-awareness presentation to San Lorenzo High School in Felton, CA:

"My name is Steve _______ and I represent the Santa Cruz County Health Department. . . .
But, anyway, you take it and put it on the reservoir tip and now puts it over his penis and from
what I've heard, I heard that this really does make a difference as to how a condom feels. It's supposed to
make it, feels a lot better on the inside.
Now ladies {ladies?}, when a guy is having sex with you, I don't know where you're at, but in terms
of infection guys have to be nurtured. . . .
This is, comes in bubble gum flavor and mint flavor. The only reason I bring this up is, there's a
big, big, big, big controversy out there and it has to do with oral sex. For a long time the people in the field,
efforts in the field felt that oral sex was a very, very, very small risk. In terms of sexual activity the highest
risk to you is anal intercourse, the second riskiest sexual behavior is vaginal intercourse. And we did tell
people that the least riskiest and probably safe sexual activity was oral intercourse. {What about a
non-risk, non-sexual activity?} . . .
There's one other thing that women can use and it's a brand new thing. It's rather gaudy lookin'.
I should show it just because it is one other option you have. It's called a female condom. Anybody every
heard of one? They look like this. This actually clumps or bunches up. This goes inside the vagina, all the
way in and then, and this sits over the outside. It's about this long. But that is a female condom. {to use
for abstinence, of course} . . .
Remember that when {not if} you have sex with somebody . . .
We recommend that you follow your family values around when in fact you have sex. {That is to
say, of course, that it is a family value to have unmarried sex.}


From: Harvey Caplan, M.D. (staff clinician at Planned Parenthood/World Population of Alameda-San
Francisco) quoted in Stephanie Mills (Planned Parenthood board member) -The Joy of Birth Control-:

"If, however, you have separated your sex and love needs . . . then you could
have a hundred partners and still be a perfect candidate for a good close
relationship later on. So having multiple sexual partners in itself doesn't mean
anything.



From: Wardell B. Pomeroy, Ph.D. (of Planned Parenthood), "A New Look at Incest," -Forum- magazine,
November 1976, 84-89:

". . . incest between adults and younger children can also prove to be a
satisfying and enriching experience. Incestuous relationships can--and
do--work out well."



From Wardell Pomeroy, Ph.D., -Boys and Sex- (New York: Delacorte Press, 1981) 171, 172. This book is
used in numerous public school systems in the United States:

"I have known cases of farm boys who have had a loving sexual relationship
with an animal and who felt good about their behavior until they got to
college, where they learned for the first time that what they had done was
'abnormal.' Then they were upset." {Pomeroy, not Life Research Institute put -abnormal- in quotes.}
.pa
Endnotes

1. Alfred C. Kinsey quoted in Mary Calderone and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, -Abortion in the United States- (New York: Paul B.
Hoeber, Harper & Brothers, 1958), 157.
2. -Symposium, 27 March 1968,- "Rutgers Law Review," vol. 22, 415-43.
3. -Washington Star Times,- 3 May 1973.
4. Dinah Richard, -Has Sex Education Felled our Teenagers?-
5. Gregg Harris, -The Christian Home School-, (Brentwood, TN: Wolgemuth & Hyatt, 1988) 37-38.
6. Many publications, especially "Planned Parenthood Must Be Stopped," American Life Lobby.
7. Barbara Morris, -Change Agents in the Schools- (Upland, CA: Barbara M. Morris Report) 144.
8. Many publications, especially "Sexuality Alphabet," Planned Parenthood Federation of America, 1982.
9. Ibid.
10. Ibid.
11. Lena Levine, "Psycho-sexual Development," -Planned Parenthood News-, Summer 1953, 10.
12. Eleanor S. Morrison and Miln Underhill Price, -Values in Sexuality- (New York: Hart Publishing Company and A & W Publishers, 1974) 100.
13. Sandalyn McKasson, "Sex and Seduction in the Classroom," quoted in Richie Martin, ed., -Judgement in the Gate: A Call to Awaken the
Church- (Westchester, IL: Crossway Books, 1986) 97, all quoted in George Grant, -Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood-
(Brentwood, TN: Wolgemuth & Hyatt, 1984) 109.
14. Ibid., 98.
15. Ibid.
16. McKasson, 100.
17. Jacqueline Kasun, "Turning Children into Sex Experts," -The Public Interest,- Spring 1979, 14.
18. "Control" [?] 2; and Tim LaHaye, -The Battle for the Public Schools- (Old Tappan, JH: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1983), 119.
19. "What is Peer Education in Human Sexuality" (a brochure), Planned Parenthood of Greater Metropolitan Washington, 1.
20. A poll for Planned Parenthood by Louis Harris and Associates, -American Teens Speak: Sex, Myths, TV, and Birth Control,- 1986, Lou Harris
Project No. 864012.
21. Ibid., 71.
22. Ibid., 71-72.
23. Ibid., 15.
24. Ibid., 24, and see Robert Ruff's analysis in his book -Aborting Planned Parenthood- (Houston: New Vision Books, 1988), 19.
25. Ibid., 18.
26. Ibid., 53.
27. -Look Magazine-, 8 March 1966.
28. -Time Magazine-, "On Teaching Children About Sex," 9 June 1968, 37.
29. "Sex Facts," Planned Parenthood Center of Syracuse (New York), 1977.
30. Announcement for the "Family Life Education: Are We Prepared?," conference, May 12, 1989, sponsored by Planned Parenthood of Northern
New England and co-sponsored by the Vermont Department of Education (includes accompanying material by the Planned Parenthood
Federation of America), 1989.
31. Ibid.
32. Ibid.
33. Ibid.
34. "Safe Sex and Teens," -SIECUS Report-, September/October, 1988. SIECUS is Sex Information and Education Council of the United States.
35. Wardell B. Pomeroy, Ph.D., -Boys and Sex/Girls and Sex,- listed as "Books to Aid Parents in Their Task as Sex Educators," Planned
Parenthood Association of San Diego County, undated.
36. "A Close Look at Planned Parenthood," -Focus on the Family -radio program, 26-27 October 1989
37. Ibid.
38. The Boston Women's Health Book Collective, -Our Bodies, Ourselves: A Book By and For Women,- (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1976), 42.
39. Ibid., 53.
40. The Boston Women's Health Book Collective, -Our New Bodies, Ourselves: A Book By and For Women,- (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984),
122.
41. "A Close Look at Planned Parenthood," "Focus on the Family" radio program, 26-27 October, 1989.
42. Rustum Roy and Delly Roy, "The Autonomy of Sensuality/The 'Final Solution' of Sex Ethics," quoted in Sol Gordon and Roger Libby,
-Sexuality Today And Tomorrow, -317. The Roys refer to -Honest Sex- (New York: New American Library, 1968).
43. "Serving Families, Preserving Freedom," Annual Meeting, 1981. Special Issue, Theology Workshop, -Planned Parenthood Review-, Winter 1981,
10, Joseph Fletcher speaking.
44. -National Right to Life News,- February 1976, quoted in Oregon ProLife Council Packet, page C5.
45. -The Chelsea Journal,- July/August 1977.
46. -The Great Orgasm Robbery,- Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, 1977.
47. -The Perils of Puberty,-, 1974, Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, 15
48. Ibid., 17.
49. Sol Gordon, -Ten Heavy Facts About Sex- (#4), (Syracuse, NY: Ed-U Press, 1975).

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Provided courtesy of:

The Catholic Resource Network
Trinity Communications
PO Box 3610
Manassas, VA 22110
Voice: 703-791-2576
Fax: 703-791-4250
Data: 703-791-4336
Telnet: CRNET.ORG

The Catholic Resource Network is a Catholic online information and
service system. To browse CRNET or join, set your modem to 8 data
bits, 1 stop bit and no parity, and call 1-703-791-4336.
-------------------------------------------------------------------