Sex educaton according to liberals!

What is the deal with liberal sex ed? Any conservative complaints?

Theta Q

Comments

  1. Theta QNovember 4, 2009 at 8:31 AM

    sex education according to liberals!

    Okay guys and gals,

    Something just occurred to me recently. I have clashed with many liberals saying that the teen sex rate at 60% and pre-marital sex rate at 90% is this unchangeable constant that is hard-wired into our brains, our society and the universe itself. It can't be altered in any way. There is a recent study of the federal government that has shown that abstinence programs are a JOKE because they do not result in reduced teen sex.

    So why BOTHER with sex education? According to the left winged premise, the knowledge of sex and desire for it is hard wired in us all. It is the impenetrable mountain of rock that can't be defeated. What is there left to teach? Like in the TV show "everybody loves raymond" the father Frank said that when he didn't mention sex to his sons that it was because you don't need to tell the bee where the nectar is (or something).

    You see my point? I once had a fellow student tell me a story in opposition to my pro-virginity letters to the school paper. She said that there were two girls: one of them had parents that said NEVER have pre-marital sex. She DID and I think was promiscuous. The other's parents said if and when you decided to do it use a condom. And she had only one sex partner which she later married or something like that. I told her that it was a typical story: conservatism being applied half-ass and getting poor results.

    So to repeat my question: if the kids are hard wired and they are gonna do it anyway, then what is there left to teach and why teach anything?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top 15 Reasons Why "Star Wars" is Better Than "Titanic"

Top 15 Reasons Why "Star Wars" is Better Than "Titanic" Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 06:38:58 PDT (15-A) Titanic morals: a. gamble, b. cheat on your fiance', c. pose nude for pictures, d. premarital sex is OK if you're infatuated. (15-B) Star Wars morals: a. fight evil, b. do good, c. respect all life even if it's ugly and slithers, d. rescue princess, e. save planet. (14.) Leia is a princess, a senator, a freedom fighter, and Jedi material; Rose is just marriage bait. (13.) Ewoks throw better parties than either first class or steerage. (12.) Titanic is egalitarian by portraying poor people as sympathetic characters. Star Wars is egalitarian by promoting bug-eyed amphibians to Admiral. (11.) We know Cal is the bad guy because he sneers at the poor and treats his fiancee like property. We know Darth Vader is the bad guy because he strangles people and blows up p...
Read more

Legal same-sex marriage will snowball to more liberal indoctrination

http://news.yahoo.com/straight-people-paved-way-gay-marriage-132613801.html My response: My complaint is that government power to impose liberalism on citizens has been, and will SNOWBALL. Liberals have been SCREAMING at conservatives that NOTHING will change in their heterosexual lives and/or marriages if same-sex marriage is allowed. I recently debated with a few pro same-sex marriage users on Youtube, that when the brute, raw, sloppy and amoral FORCE of the Federal Government (aka Big Brother from the book "1984") orders Americans to have or not have certain morals, it allows liberals the POWER to define "freedom", & that it NEVER ends! When I cited that many pro so-called "LGBT" people have ALREADY stated that this is just the beginning and when I stated that this can and WILL snowball downward to have the GOVERNMENT redefine love, marriage, relationships, sexual morals, masculinity and femininity, THEY DIDN'T LIFT A FINGER TO DEFEND THEMS...
Read more

Rules for radicalism by Saul D Alinsky

The Students of Saul D. Alinsky Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972) - the son of Russian Jewish immigrants was an old Jewish radical famous as a community organizer from Chicago’s Back of the Yards. From the late 1930s until his death in 1972, Alinsky crisscrossed the country, stirring the have-nots — poor whites and blacks — to demand power from the haves. Many biographers have labeled Alinsky as a communist, but he always maintained that he never joined the Communist Party. In a Playboy Magazine interview in 1972 he said, “Anybody who tells you he was active in progressive causes in those days (1930s) and never worked with the Reds (Communists) is a goddamn liar. Their platform stood for all the right things, and unlike many liberals, they were willing to put their bodies on the line.” From the book The Life of Alinsky…. “We’re talking about revolution, not revelation” - Saul Alinsky Alinsky's Rules for Radicals By Craig Miyamoto, APR, Fellow PRSA (This is an expanded version of ...
Read more